There we are again with made in UN incitement and hate
venerdì 2 dicembre 2016 English 0 commenti
Il Giornale, Dicember 2, 2016Let's call the baby with his name: persecution of the Jewish people. And since the world has had some experience with this, it will better think for a moment about what is happening at the UN. Just persecution and to err is human, but to persist is truly diabolical. The UN General Assembly, pray of an hysteric repetition problem, voted again on a resolution dealing with Jerusalem that uses solely Arab and Muslim terminology and logic, while condemning Israel for the mere fact of being in Jerusalem. This resolution is similar to the one taken by UNESCO this past October in which Italy in particular expressed not only “shock,” but also profound regret. But looks like never mind. Out of 193 member states, 147 voted in favor of the resolution, i.e. against Israel, while seven voted against it and eight abstained.
What did Italy do? We assumed that Il Bel Paese would have avidly opposed it after Prime Minister Matteo Renzi had declared his disappointment about abstaining on the UNESCO vote that denied the Jews its certified historical heritage of Jerusalem and handed over even the Western Wall to the Muslims, thereby giving them the Temple Mount. It was there that Jesus Christ – as if no one knew by now that he was a Jew - preached to the merchants. So, Christians were also erased.
Nevertheless, precisely due to the “automatism” that the Italian Prime Minister declared as the cause of the vote at UNESCO and which apparently hadn’t been mollified, almost all European states voted in favor of the resolution, including Italy, France, Germany and the UK. Those who abstained were Australia, Guatemala, Paraguay, Papua New Guinea, Honduras, Tonga and Vanuatu. The lion-hearted few who said no to this gargantuan historical and philosophical absurdity were Israel, the United States, Canada, Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, Nauru and Palau. This resolution (A/71/I.22) is a wart upon the world’s common sense, and also upon its dignity and therefore also its ability to defend itself from Islamism.
Presented by an array of Islamic countries (among them Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, the Palestinian Authority, but also Indonesia and the People’s Democratic Republic of Lao), it was voted upon together with six other resolutions that were more about hate than condemnation, so as to mark the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian people. It say that "any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem were illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever," and then it calls Israel "to immediately cease all such illegal and unilateral measures."
What are they talking about here? Of the fact that Israel’s management of its Capital grants the Arabs of the city the same rights as Jews, which hosts them as members of the Knesset, as university students, in hospitals as patients and doctors, in academia as scholars? Are we talking about the fact that the city sparkles of beauty with its new buildings and its gardens and offices where it work son the most advanced high tech projects? The wild desire to destroy all of this leads us to think that the resolution actually gives a free hand to terrorism: it cold-bloodedly wants to wipe out whatever is Jewish, at the end of the day suggests to wipe out as many civilians as possible from Jerusalem.
This attitude of the UN can well light fires also in the European capitals. Incitement is the primary result of anti-Israeli hate, and this and thousands of other UN resolutions against the Jewish State become clear and present incitement against the Israeli democratic system itself and its effort to build a society where the three religions are respected, while the real human rights abusers such as Syria, Saudi Arabia or China are ignored.
Translation by Amy K. Rosenthal